[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: poco (updated package) [4th try]



On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 09:38:39AM +0100, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
>The package appears to be lintian clean.

lintian -i --show-overrides poco_1.2.9-3_i386.changes
W: libpoco2: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl
N:
N:   This package appears to be covered by the GNU GPL but depends on the
N:   OpenSSL libssl package and does not mention a license exemption or
N:   exception for OpenSSL in its copyright file. The GPL (including
N:   version 3) is incompatible with some terms of the OpenSSL license, and
N:   therefore Debian does not allow GPL-licensed code linked with OpenSSL
N:   libraries unless there is a license exception explicitly permitting
N:   this.
N:
O: libpoco2: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libPocoFoundation2 libPocoFoundationd2 libPocoNet2 libPocoNetSSL2 libPocoNetSSLd2 libPocoNetd2 libPocoUtil2 libPocoUtild2 libPocoXML2 libPocoXMLd2
N:
N:   The package name of a library package should usually reflect the
N:   soname of the included library. The package name can determined from
N:   the library file name with the following code snippet:
N:
N:    $ objdump -p /path/to/libfoo-bar.so.1.2.3 | sed -n -e's/^[[:space:]]*SONAME[[:space:]]*//p' | sed -e's/\([0-9]\)\.so\./\1-/; s/\.so\.//'
N:
N:   Refer to Library Packaging guide 5 for details.
N:

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: