Hi, * Nelson A. de Oliveira <naoliv@gmail.com> [2007-07-25 19:31]: > On 7/25/07, Nico Golde <nico@ngolde.de> wrote: > >* Nelson A. de Oliveira <naoliv@gmail.com> [2007-07-25 17:48]: > >> It's a recommendation. It's not wrong to don't use Homepage on the > >> package long description. > > > >Who sad it's wrong? I just asked why he doesn't use it. > > "Please use the Homepage tag like described in 6.3.4 dev-ref." isn't > the same as "Why don't you use the Homepage field, suggested at > section 6.2.4 of dev-ref?", is it? :-) Ups I wrote a different text before but only had the second in mind. Anyway there is no reason to not use it here and last but no least it's up to the sponsor and in this case I would not sponsor it because that's exactly why the tag exists. The reference just says recommend because it's not a must-have for package referring to the policy. Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - nion@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html
Attachment:
pgpeN4viF4msp.pgp
Description: PGP signature