Re: RFS: paco
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
David Paleino ha scritto:
> Paco, instead, logs the "make install" activity, so you can see which files were
> stored where, and you could always add files to the log, even after the
> completion of the install (that's a feature checkinstall doesn't have, if I
> don't go wrong) [1].
Forgot to say, with the gpaco gui, you can easily create "binary packages" of
what you did install. They are simple .tar.gz archives, which you might untar in
/, and have a fully-functional software installed.
By the way, I've just sent the upstream author a mail, asking him for
differences between paco and checkinstall.
My main point is, however, about LFS systems. paco would definitely be a good
package in those cases.
Feel free to comment ;-)
Cheers,
David
- --
. ''`. Debian packager! | http://snipurl.com/gofoxygo/
: :' : User #334216 | http://www.hanskalabs.net/
`. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://www.debianizzati.org/
`- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGNbKM5qqQFxOSsXQRArMbAJ4yOr0AKqS5vHYteU9MbU/uG9fN1ACgv6Od
18tDrD2oLrtwZOHouuPdj+w=
=+sPl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: