[snip] On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 05:15:18PM +0100, Thomas Jollans wrote: > mentors.debian.org says that the package is lintian clean, my local lintian > disagrees in points which are, IMHO, ignoreable (non-executable scripts > in /usr/lib/chatplus which have wrappers in /usr/bin, one icon > in /usr/lib/chatplus) > W: chatplus: image-file-in-usr-lib usr/lib/chatplus/pixmaps/icon.png N: N: This package installs a pixmap or a bitmap within /usr/lib. According N: to the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard, architecture-independent files N: need to be placed within /usr/share instead. AFAICT. an icon in /usr/lib is against the File System Hierarchy. I'm not sure how the non-executable scripts should be handled but I guess they should get the executable bit set. -- GNU/Linux registered user #224950 Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group <www.eglug.org> Member. Life powered by Debian, Homepage: www.foolab.org -- Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Preferable attachments: .PDF, .HTML, .TXT Thanx for adding this text to Your signature
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature