[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: MMS - My Media System



Am Sonntag, 11. März 2007 schrieb Ricardo Mones:
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 09:34:56 +0100
>
> Roman Müllenschläder <info@prodeia.de> wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 23. Januar 2007 schrieben Sie:
> > > > I filed the ITP and it was accepted as:
> > > > -
> > > > Bug#408099: ITP: mms -- My Media System - a complete Mediasuite for
> > > > various devices
> > > > -
> > > >
> > > > So, I'm keen on whats next ;)
> >
> > Some time hs gone now and I would like to rerequest sponsorship on the
> > packages for MMS (My Media System), a complete media suit for various
> > devices.
> >
> >  Package name   : mms
> >  Version        : 1.0.8.2-1
> >  Upstream author: Anders Rune Jensen <anders@gnulinux.dk>
> >  URL            : http://www.mymediasystem.com
> >  License        : GPL
> >  Section        : sound
> >  Package URL    : http://www.prodeia.de/mms/
> >
> > It builds these binaries:
> > mms-common - My Media System (common files)
> > mms-standard - My Media System - a complete Mediasuite (SDL, Alsaplayer)
> > mms-slim - My Media System - a complete Mediasuite (SDl, Gstreamer)
> > mms-mpeg - My Media System - a complete Mediasuite (FF-DVB, Alsaplayer)
> >
> > The packages are lintian clean and pbuilder builds them well for Edgy,
> > Sid and Etch.
>
>   Not completely, there's some warnings caused by non-executable scripts
> around, and, also an informative hint about splitting the (large)
> arch-independent portion in mms-common in another package (mms-common-data
> fore example) which I think is a good idea in this case. There's also a
> typo in debian/control too (DXR§?) though I'm not sure what these mean, so
> probably the description can be improved a bit.
>
>   If you fix these I'll be happy to sponsor the package.
>
>   regards,

Thx for your comments and the will to sponsor!
Executeable thing and typo is just fixed ... indep will be added as soon as I 
know how to realise ;)
Thought the informative lintian hints are neglectable ...

Lg
Roman



Reply to: