Re: packages for netcdf 3.6.2 (released today)
Kevin B McCarty <kmccarty@Princeton.EDU> writes:
> Hmm. Do you think that the FTP masters should be asked to remove the
> netcdf-doc source package from unstable once the new netcdf is there? If
> so, I guess there is no problem with including a netcdf-doc binary
> package built from the netcdf source package. The existing netcdf-doc
> source package is most unlikely to end up on the autobuilders
> (especially now that I realize it is of course arch:all) before netcdf
> 3.6.2 is in unstable :-)
If a new netcdf source package starts producing the netcdf-doc binary
package and that's the only binary package produced by the netcdf-doc
source package, netcdf-doc will be removed from the archive
semi-automatically without any further action by the maintainer required.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: