Le mardi 2 janvier 2007 12:55, Daniel Baumann a écrit : > what is the current state? Hi, I think maybe you don't receive my last message "RFS: tremulous-editor" (see the end of this message for the copy of original message). I have no answer about licence to use. Upstream author don't contact me. How can I proceed ? I have send the next email to: - Damien Laniel <heretik@tuxfamily.org>: He's Maintener of "tremulous" Dedian Package (http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/tremulous.html) - Tim Angus <tangus@users.sourceforge.net>: Official Upstream author - Official Forum of Termulous: http://tremulous.sourceforge.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=2810&highlight=salokine&sid=81a87023f53aedf8644d65254eae6c18 - Official Maillist of Developers: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=31197265&forum_id=45515 What can i do !! ****************Message (Begin) > Package Debian: tremulous-editor > From: Salokine <salokine.terata@fr...> - 2006-12-08 13:53 > Hi, > > I'm working to create "tremulous-editor" package on Linux/Debian system. > This package configure GTK-Radiant for Tremulous following > http://tremmapping.pbwiki.com/GtkRadiant1_5-Linux instructions > > I'm using these two files: > > - http://www.clanopener.com/catalyc/trem_stuff.zip > - http://www.clanopener.com/catalyc/trem.game_1.5.zip > > I must create non-native package (including official source code) > Can you say me where I could find official release of these files ? > (homepage, > CVS ...etc). > > Can you give me more informations about : > - Upstream Authors (Tim Angus, Eutectic ?) > - Copyright/Licence (nothing in this files) > > Who can help me for other questions about "tremulous-editor" ? > > Thanks for your answers. > > Good evening. > Salokine. > FRANCE. ****************Message (End) Except this point, I think my package is Ok ? I'll work on tremulous-mappack only after this package (tremoulus-editor) is Ok. Have an nice day and thanks for your help Daniel. @+ Salokine My Previous message: ---------- Message transmis ---------- Subject: RFS: tremulous-editor Date: samedi 9 décembre 2006 02:15 From: Salokine <salokine.terata@free.fr> To: Debian Mentors ML <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org> Cc: Tim Angus <tangus@users.sourceforge.net>, Heretik <heretik@tuxfamily.org> Hi Daniel, I prefer to finish tremulous-editor package before continue with tremulous-package. Thank you for important help. Have a nice Week-end. Salokine. Next, my answers: Le mercredi 29 novembre 2006 01:58, Daniel Baumann a écrit : > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tremulous-editor > > at least give the URI to the *.dsc, i don't want to fire up > ${www-browser} just because of you. OK: The full URL of .dsc (new version) http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tremulous-editor/tremulous-edito r_0.0.20060518.dsc > * package should be non-native. OK: Package is now non-native > * README and README.Debian are useless, doesn't contain any > information at all. OK: Files deleted > * why priority extra? OK: Package is now setting to optional priority > * it should be debhelper (>= 5), not debhelper (>=5), > and tremulous (>= 1.1.0), gtkradiant (>= 1.5.0) > not tremulous (>=1.1.0), gtkradiant (>=1.5.0). OK: First space is adding > * short and long descriptions must be improved/extended a lot. OK > * do you have no own website, do you really want to do the primary > distribution through ftp.debian.org? ??: My own site don't speak about tremulous (see salokine.hd.free.fr ;-) ) I have insert the official wiki which explains how to do manualy what I do with this package. Is it good ? > * your copyright is incomplete, there is other code with different > authors/license in the tarball. you need to list that too. look > at tineyerp-client from unstable for an example how to do > multi-authors/multi-license copyright files properly. ??: I'm not sure. I think I need help on this section. I couldn't find tineyerp-client package. I saw "tremulous" package as exemple. But I don't know what licence to use and upstream author don't answer to my email (Tim Angus <tangus@users.sourceforge.net>). > * dirs is useless here. OK: "debian/dirs" deleted > * docs is empty, hence useless. OK: "debian/docs" deleted > * your package is only building one binary-package, hence i do > recommend to not mix prefixed helpers and not prefixed. > therefore, rename tremulous-editor.dirs to dirs. OK > * remove the commented useless things in rules OK > * if you don't do something in configure:, remove it completely. OK > * if you don't do something in buid:, replace it with this: > > ---snip--- > build: > ---snap--- OK > * remove the commented useless dh_* calls. OK Many thanks and good night. Salokine. ------------------------------------------------------- |
Attachment:
pgpylgaGbN3mK.pgp
Description: PGP signature