Re: upstream package split
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm the maintainer of SQLite3 packages. Upstream used to ship the
> sources and
> documentation in one tarball. Now this is changed, source still ships in
> a tarball, but
> docs is separeted to a zip file. What would be the best, merge both to
> a .orig.tar.gz or make
> two source packages? I plan to remerge upstream, but don't know what
> upstream name to
> use, should it be sqlite3+docs or remain plain sqlite3? Should I accept
> the seperation?
>
> Regards,
> Laszlo/GCS
>
>
Well, is there any good reason why the upstream made this?
Are the manpages in the source tarball? Remember that each binary needs
a manpage.
The docs zip contains which kind of documentation? PDFs? HTMLs? Is
needed in the sqlite3 package?
If you want to merge them there's no need of the `+docs`, just sqlite3.
Regards,
Jose Luis.
- --
ghostbar on debian linux 'sid' 2.6.22 x86_64-SMP - #382503
Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://linuxtachira.org
http://debian.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-ve #debian-devel-es
San Cristóbal, Venezuela. http://chaslug.org.ve GPG: 0xCACAB118
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHZXD/OKCtW8rKsRgRAm+yAKCkAfiGdF6k2Q6nBpTFGWr7irYkaACfYKZ4
IL0jRarIZkxPvM8f7+hB78Y=
=wc2M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: