[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

a "package-all" package



Hello,

I'm packaging an interpreted language, Yorick, and a bunch of add-ons for that language.

I'd like to provide a wrapper package that would depend on all the packages in this family present in main and suggest the one that is in non-free. I would like users to get a complete system with all the buzzes and whistles by typing
 aptitude install yorick-almost-everything
rather than
aptitude install yorick-dev yorick-doc yorick-imutil yorick- yeti...........

"almost" in the package name is their because I might miss recent packages, the package in non-free will in general not be installed automatically, and "almost" starts with an "a" so it's listed right after yorick in lexical order.

I realise that this package should be updated often, i.e. each time a new add-on enters the archive.

Initially, I wanted this package to be build from the "yorick" source package, which builds already yorick, yorick-data, yorick-dev and yorick-doc. But I wonder whether it's a good idea, because that would mean I would have to update the main "yorick" package each time I add a new add-on to the archive. On the other hand, it does seem silly to me to create a completely empty source package just for the sake of dependencies. I'm even wondering whether this package should be native.

Any opinions?

Regards, Thibaut.



Reply to: