Re: ITP bugs

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ITP bugs
From: Jon Dowland <lists@alcopop.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 10:06:20 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 1191402380.11357.1.camel@anubis.ncl.ac.uk>
In-reply-to: <20071001184103.GB8016@(none)>
References: <20071001184103.GB8016@(none)>

On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 20:41 +0200, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
> Among my 5 packages waiting at mentors.d.n, only the two more recents
> close ITP bugs. Would it be better practice if I issue a new Debian
> revisions for the 3 others after opening an ITP bug, with a changelog
> closing the latter?

An ITP bug is a good idea to avoid duplication.  I wouldn't bother with
a new package just to close an ITP, though. File one and close it by
hand when the package is uploaded.

-- 
Jon Dowland

Reply to:

References:
- ITP bugs
  - From: Pierre THIERRY <nowhere.man@levallois.eu.org>

Prev by Date: Re: How package a binary library with unversioned soname?
Next by Date: Reason for Failed build on some arch only
Previous by thread: Re: ITP bugs
Next by thread: RFS: mt19937, bordeaux-threads, salza-png, cl-vectors, vecto
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread