Re: RFS: xpn
Jan C. Nordholz wrote:
> I don't remember that there was a consensus about whether unreleased versions
> should be kept in the changelog (link appreciated if someone knows better).
> This will depend on the sponsor's preference, and thus I wouldn't consider it
> a "major problem" (but IANADD either).
Hmm. Well i have no link, cause i don't know that there has been any
different opinions on this. It might not be a technical problem, but as
the changelog is part of what the users _can_ see it might not be a good
idea to publish something thats not available to anyone, but the
developer. To say: If there is something you don't wanna show the user,
why would you want to tell him, that it exists? Just to nag him?
Apart from this: I don't think that Michael did this by intension.
Regards,
Patrick
Reply to:
- References:
- RFS: xpn
- From: Michael Krauss <mickraus@googlemail.com>
- Re: RFS: xpn
- From: schoenfeld / in-medias-res <schoenfeld@in-medias-res.com>
- Re: RFS: xpn
- From: "Jan C. Nordholz" <jckn@gmx.net>