Re: debian .orig.tar.gz vs. upstream tar.gz

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: debian .orig.tar.gz vs. upstream tar.gz
From: Thibaut Paumard <thibaut.paumard@free.fr>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:15:51 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 053C02E3-4450-477D-BCCE-ED81868F91B1@free.fr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070828011110.GB22197@imsc.res.in>
References: <[🔎] 20070822181152.GB4513@caribdis.nul-unu.com> <[🔎] 20070822192553.595da857.codehelp@debian.org> <[🔎] 20070827084851.GA14659@imsc.res.in> <[🔎] slrnfd5ums.lp4.joerg@alea.gnuu.de> <[🔎] 20070828010539.GA22197@imsc.res.in> <[🔎] 20070828011110.GB22197@imsc.res.in>


Le 28 août 07 à 03:11, Kapil Hari Paranjape a écrit :

Hello,

On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:

In any case if this is done then it *must* be documented in
debian/changelog and/or README.Debian-source.


The "*must*" in the above line is not supported by Debian policy.
So I'll change that to a "*should*" :-)

And I would change "debian/changelog and/or README.Debian-source" todebian/copyright, where the information about how orig.tar.gz wasobtained belong.


Regards, T.

Reply to:

References:
- Skipping version numbers in adopted packages
  - From: Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <rodrigo@nul-unu.com>
- Re: Skipping version numbers in adopted packages
  - From: Neil Williams <codehelp@debian.org>
- debian .orig.tar.gz vs. upstream tar.gz
  - From: Kapil Hari Paranjape <kapil@imsc.res.in>
- Re: debian .orig.tar.gz vs. upstream tar.gz
  - From: Jörg Sommer <joerg@alea.gnuu.de>
- Re: debian .orig.tar.gz vs. upstream tar.gz
  - From: Kapil Hari Paranjape <kapil@imsc.res.in>
- Re: debian .orig.tar.gz vs. upstream tar.gz
  - From: Kapil Hari Paranjape <kapil@imsc.res.in>

Prev by Date: RFS: tesseract
Next by Date: Re: RFS: sanduhr (restoring removed package)
Previous by thread: Re: debian .orig.tar.gz vs. upstream tar.gz
Next by thread: RFS: tesseract
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread