Re: RFS: hfsprogs - mkfs and fsck for HFS and HFS+ file systems

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFS: hfsprogs - mkfs and fsck for HFS and HFS+ file systems
From: "Paul Wise" <pabs@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 12:16:31 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] e13a36b30707201916v115f6dbbo4886baf7debddfd8@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070720001548.GA4402@ime.usp.br>
References: <[🔎] 20070717194052.GA2959@ime.usp.br> <[🔎] e13a36b30707171740u74c44f1lce8ffa9525d19694@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20070720001548.GA4402@ime.usp.br>

On 7/20/07, Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br> wrote:

It is quite nice that you have shown some interest in hfsprogs. I will
explain what you have asked.


I don't really have any interest in them (don't interact with Macs at
the moment), my motivation for the question was to perhaps get those
three packages merged into one (upstream) to reduce the need for 3
separate packages that do the same or similar things.

> What is the relationship between hfsprogs and the existing hfsplus and
> hfsutils packages?

The relationship is simple <snip>


Thanks for the explanation.

--
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Reply to:

References:
- RFS: hfsprogs - mkfs and fsck for HFS and HFS+ file systems
  - From: Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>
- Re: RFS: hfsprogs - mkfs and fsck for HFS and HFS+ file systems
  - From: "Paul Wise" <pabs@debian.org>
- Re: RFS: hfsprogs - mkfs and fsck for HFS and HFS+ file systems
  - From: Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>

Prev by Date: to use upstream scons or not
Next by Date: Re: Auto-building many manpages: redundant work for the buildds ?
Previous by thread: Re: RFS: hfsprogs - mkfs and fsck for HFS and HFS+ file systems
Next by thread: Re: RFS: hfsprogs - mkfs and fsck for HFS and HFS+ file systems
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread