[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: #235790 RFP: jing -- A XML RelaxNG validator



>Even then, there is no guarantee that jing will be accepted into Debian
>- it is whether you (or the maintainer) can generate sufficient
>interest in the package on this list or you or the maintainer apply to
>become a DD yourself and go through that process (currently at least a
>year). Sponsorship depends on catching the attention of an interested
>sponsor - there certainly does not appear to have been sufficient
>interest so far. You have to convince a DD that there is a role for
>jing in Debian.
 
 Can't recognize the need to become a DD in a relation with generating interest for such a package unless that the DD is the controller of accepting or to be interested in accepting such a package.

>There are alternative packages already available - the
>request for sponsorship should make it clear why this package is
>superior to what already exists. This can be difficult with a package
>that is dead upstream.

At the time there're alternative packages already available and maybe superior, and that the package already is dead upstream, why there exist such packages requests by the system and no way to control the packaging purposes that may have been full filed by these alternatives which leads to remove crossed in purpose requests .
Hope to get my point or what i mean thankfully.
Thanks in advance


On 12/31/06, Neil Williams <linux@codehelp.co.uk > wrote:
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 16:34:38 +0200
"Eng. Mina Ramses" < mina.ramses@gmail.com> wrote:

When you start a cross-post, you should keep replies to the list too.

> >It was requested to be packaged some time ago (Tue, 02 Mar 2004) but
> >no package materialised (it is still an RFP, not an ITP) so the RFP
> >was closed due to lack of interest by an automated script.
>
>  It's ok, i got the point that the RFP closed , but i'm still asking
> it's waiting
> a sponsoring <http://sponsors.debian.net/viewpkg.php?id=99> and
> already has a maintainer.

Then what is needed is for that maintainer to look for a sponsor - he's
probably already tried.

The RFP is closed - he needs to reopen it and retitle it an ITP.

There is no sponsor listed, he needs to request sponsorship here by
posting appropriate details from that ITP and giving a download
location for the .dsc file he created whilst packaging the software.

If you want to help then I suggest you talk to the listed maintainer:
Johannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de > and ask him nicely if he is still
interested in packaging the software and whether he is prepared to
create the ITP and the rest of the work. If he is not, you could take
it on yourself and reopen the RFP as an ITP and ask for sponsorship
yourself.

> >There does not appear to have been
> >any upstream activity since 2003 so are you also willing to do all
> >the upstream work? (When upstream is dead, the Debian maintainer
> >takes responsibility for fixing upstream bugs.)
>
> no prob. may you please point  me with a good guide regarding
> upstreaming

? To be upstream means simply maintaining and developing the upstream
code, in your case you would need write access to whatever source
management systems are used via
http://www.thaiopensource.com/relaxng/jing.html

If you have no access and want to be upstream, try to contact the
previous upstream developer(s) and see what is happening. In the
absence of a response, you may have to fork jing and create a new home
for it at SourceForge or somewhere similar.

Even then, there is no guarantee that jing will be accepted into Debian
- it is whether you (or the maintainer) can generate sufficient
interest in the package on this list or you or the maintainer apply to
become a DD yourself and go through that process (currently at least a
year). Sponsorship depends on catching the attention of an interested
sponsor - there certainly does not appear to have been sufficient
interest so far. You have to convince a DD that there is a role for
jing in Debian. There are alternative packages already available - the
request for sponsorship should make it clear why this package is
superior to what already exists. This can be difficult with a package
that is dead upstream.

--

Neil Williams
=============
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/





--
|Mina r. Fahmy|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GNU/Linux registered user #312544 * Debian 3.1 Sarge * PC
http://mina-fahmy.blogspot.com
Linux Network Consultant member
==========================================================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDjwHQS45JQJZP7ZQRAmUDAJ9Q8cUGdii55uGM2uQJj7ICUqGTwACgm78g
rYYpiMdrJW0XS+Xou15bREE=
=m1Lp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

=============
Key ID: 0x964F ED94 on --keyserver http://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net
Key fingerprint = 35DD 3279 EB3E A711 1205  466F 4B8E 4940 964F ED94
==========================================================================================
Reply to: