[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: what is debian way to modify Makefile.frag ?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -=| Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt,  7.12.2006 18:49 |=-
> Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org> writes:
>> ...but using a patch management system is strongly recommended from the
>> q&a point of view.
> 
> Assuming you meant QA here: No, it's not. If there would be only one
> patch system, you would be right. But between no patch system, dpatch,
> cdbs-simplepatchsys, quilt, dbs and home-brewn patch systems, half of
> the QA work becomes figuring out how to apply the friggin patch for the
> actual problem.
> 
> It's more comfortable for normal package maintainers, though: Moving
> changes to new upstream versions is reduced to cp -r $old/debian/
> $new/debian, apply errors can easily be seperated and it's easy to
> forward stuff to upstream.

Marc,

Where is the "proper" place for documenting the patch system used?
README.Debian-source?
By "proper" I mean where does QA team look for such information?
How can we make QA's job easier, while still benefit from using a patch
system?


	dam
- --
Damyan Ivanov                           Modular Software Systems
dam@modsoftsys.com
phone +359(2)928-2611, 929-3993              fax +359(2)920-0994
mobile +359(88)856-6067             dam@jabber.minus273.org/Gaim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFeEtTHqjlqpcl9jsRAjqSAJ9GEhwQGJNiMqmuWsVkOR2R07jAlACgsCPb
/XgUQJCa1tnRfdaYPptmTQo=
=VbVa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: