Re: Depending on an essential package
- To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Depending on an essential package
- From: Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>
- Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 11:28:08 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87k62aqjbb.fsf@florent.maison>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <874ptkpqk5.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> (Goswin von Brederlow's message of "Tue, 31 Oct 2006 14:23:22 +0100")
- References: <450E8317.2020109@teco.edu> <20060918113348.GA11757@mauritius.dodds.net> <E1GeVu4-0007gF-3y@scyw00225.scy001.de> <874ptkpqk5.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
> Reduces the memory wasted and speeds up processing in dpkg, dselect,
> apt, aptitude, britney, ...
It's also useful for simple humans looking at the dependencies of a
package: having all dependencies, including those on essential packages,
would clutter the Depends line without adding much value in most cases.
For instance, I would not be very interested to learn that $PACKAGE
depends on debianutils for the only reason that it uses /usr/bin/which
or /bin/mktemp in a script. But several such explicit dependencies would
really clutter the Depends line, and /that/ would be annoying.
--
Florent
Reply to: