[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: python-musicbrainz2



On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 10:53:21PM +0200, Luká?? Lalinský wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm looking for a sponsor for package python-musicbrainz2
> (http://bugs.debian.org/370255). It's a simple Python module for using the new
> MusicBrainz XML web service.
> 
> I'm mainly interested in this as it's a dependency of MusicBrainz Picard tagger,
> but it will be also used by the new versions (since 0.5, I think) of player
> Listen, which is already in Debian.
> 
> The package is at:
> http://users.musicbrainz.org/~luks/tmp/deb-python-musicbrainz2/
> 
I checked out your package and here is what I got:

$ lintian -viI python-musicbrainz2_0.3.1-1_i386.changes
N: Setting up lab in /tmp/GvSvLjRzGB ...
N: Processing changes file python-musicbrainz2_0.3.1-1_i386.changes ...
N: Processing 3 packages...
N: ----
N: Processing source package python-musicbrainz2 (version 0.3.1-1) ...
E: python-musicbrainz2 source:
build-depends-indep-should-be-build-depends cdbs
N:
N:   The specified package is required to run the clean target of
N:   debian/rules and therefore must be listed in Build-Depends, even if
no
N:   architecture-dependent packages are built.
N:
N:   Refer to Policy Manual, section 7.6 for details.
N:
E: python-musicbrainz2 source:
build-depends-indep-should-be-build-depends python | python-dev |
python-all-dev
E: python-musicbrainz2 source:
build-depends-indep-should-be-build-depends debhelper
E: python-musicbrainz2 source:
build-depends-indep-should-be-build-depends python-support (>= 0.3)
N: ----
N: Processing binary package python-musicbrainz2-doc (version 0.3.1-1)
...
N: ----
N: Processing binary package python-musicbrainz2 (version 0.3.1-1) ...
N: Removing /tmp/GvSvLjRzGB ...

Basically, you should change the mentioned dependencies so that they are
Build-Depends instead of Build-Depends-Indep.

Regards,

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: