Re: Package does not build on ia64 and sparc
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 09:01:30PM +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> my package does not build on ia64 due to what seems to be dependency
> problems:
> /usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/apt-get --purge $CHROOT_OPTIONS -q -y install debhelper libapt-front-dev libqt4-dev qt4-dev-tools docbook-to-man pkg-config libmysqlclient15-dev
> Reading Package Lists...
> Building Dependency Tree...
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libapt-front-dev: Depends: libtagcoll-dev (< 1.6) but 1.6.3-1 is to be installed
> E: Broken packages
> apt-get failed.
> Package installation failed
> Full build log here: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=packagesearch&ver=2.1&arch=ia64&stamp=1149912912&file=log&as=raw
> Whom should I contact about this? The maintainer of
> libtagcoll/libapt-front-dev or the porter team, since it works fine on
> every other architecture.
It works fine on every other architecture because the current version of
libapt-front-dev is *built* on every other architecture. On ia64 it is not,
it fails to build. So you should talk to the libapt-front maintainer, who
should talk to the porters as needed.
> It also does not build on sparc, where I was unable to determine the
> reason from the build log:
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=packagesearch&ver=2.1&arch=sparc&stamp=1149339169&file=log&as=raw
A wedged buildd config: apt was probably put on hold because the new
version was SIGBUSing on sparc, and packagesearch naturally needs the
current version of apt for building, so someone will need to un-hold apt on
mrpurply. I'll talk to the admins.
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 03:45:08PM -0500, Carlo Segre wrote:
> >It also does not build on sparc, where I was unable to determine the
> >reason from the build log:
> >http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=packagesearch&ver=2.1&arch=sparc&stamp=1149339169&file=log&as=raw
> Sparc is not keeping up.
Sparc is keeping up quite well, it's just not currently considered a release
candidate for reasons other than buildd power alone.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to: