On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 10:53 +0200, Piotr Ozarowski wrote: > I registered a weeks ago but... I didn't receive confirmation mail yet (sic!) > I have even send a bug report to neilm@debian.org, but no reply till today :( Hopefully he will fix this soon. > Believe me, I was searching for it in reportbug but i missed it. Now I know > that I should use google, reportbug is not good enough for searching bugs. google is handy to find if someone else - ubuntu/maemo/etc have packaged something already. for searching the wnpp bugs, I either bring up the page in a browser, or use the filter key. > Hmm, can you write an example? > I tried `grep -ir copyright [^COPYING]*| grep -v Salomaa` This seems appropriate: Copyright (C) 2005 Osmo Salomaa > You mean: > >On Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU General Public License > >can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'. > (quote from debian/copyright file)? From the gaupol script: # Gaupol is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by # the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or # (at your option) any later version. # # Gaupol is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the # GNU General Public License for more details. # # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License # along with Gaupol; if not, write to the Free Software # Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA > > * debian/gaupol.1: typo in DESCRIPTION: command not commands > > It was generated by dh_make, but I still think it is correct (there are more > than one command: '-h', '-t', ...) The full sentence sounds like it refers to only one command: This manual page documents briefly the gaupol commands. > > * debian/rules: shouldn't you be running setup.py clean in the > > clean target? > > It is doing nothing, should I add it? Doesn't really matter, as long as you remember to do it later if upstream makes it do something. > `apt-cache search puiparts` and `apt-file search bin/puiparts` > returns no result, can you write more about it? Sorry, typo for piuparts. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part