Re: RFS: b5

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFS: b5
From: Panu Kalliokoski <atehwa@sange.fi>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 09:57:59 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060302075759.GI19825@juiblex.it.helsinki.fi>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060301165715.GB26325@alcopop.org>
References: <20060228140521.GP32024@juiblex.it.helsinki.fi> <1141140736.3764.56.camel@darwin.os9.nl> <20060228155512.GY32024@juiblex.it.helsinki.fi> <20060228162700.GA11368@alcopop.org> <20060228174143.GE32024@juiblex.it.helsinki.fi> <[🔎] 20060301165715.GB26325@alcopop.org>

On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 04:57:15PM +0000, Jon Dowland wrote:
> > But when the package is native, you get to real _all_ changes in
> > changelog, so the situation is at least not worse in that case?
> It depends on if you wanted to read the `upstream' changes or not :)
> What are you currently putting in ./debian/changelog vs. ./ChangeLog (or
> similar)?

I'm only using debian/changelog.  On the other hand, I could generate
both from the version control log... although that might mean a lot of
log entries :)

Panu

-- 
personal contact:	panu.kalliokoski@helsinki.fi, +35841 5323835
technical contact:	atehwa@iki.fi, http://www.iki.fi/atehwa/
PGP fingerprint:	0EA5 9D33 6590 FFD4 921C  5A5F BE85 08F1 3169 70EC

Reply to:

References:
- Re: RFS: b5
  - From: Jon Dowland <lists@alcopop.org>

Prev by Date: Re: RFC/RFS: beef - a flexible BrainFuck interpreter
Next by Date: Re: RFS: tinyscheme
Previous by thread: Re: RFS: b5
Next by thread: Re: RFS: b5
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread