Re: RFS: Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK)
On 12/23/06, Steven Bird <sb@csse.unimelb.edu.au> wrote:
On 12/23/06, Andrew Donnellan <ajdlinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> Remember that the CC licences are generally considered non-free by
> Debian standards, so you may have to package the docs separately for
> non-free.
For the docs we use the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike
License which has no restrictions on commercial redistribution. Thus
I hope its not a problem.
Even CC BY-SA is still generally considered to be non-free, due to
technical wording issues, even though it has a DFSG free intent.
Of course, anything other than BY or BY-SA is clearly non-free (ie.
BY-NC-SA, BY-NC-ND, BY-ND, etc.)
However, it would be fine just to package up the software, and for
people to access the docs on the web.
That would work as well.
--
Andrew Donnellan
ajdlinuxATgmailDOTcom (primary) ajdlinuxATexemailDOTcomDOTau (secure)
http://andrewdonnellan.com http://ajdlinux.wordpress.com
ajdlinux@jabber.org.au hkp://subkeys.pgp.net 0x5D4C0C58
http://linux.org.au http://debian.org
Get free rewards - http://ezyrewards.com/?id=23484
Reply to: