Hi Warren, some further notes (as an addition to my previous written notes), as i actually figured to get it built (pooh, was some work). General: In my other mail i told you that i think it is bad to use a pre-beta. Now that i got this package to compile my impression is hardened because while compiling there do occur about several hundred of warnings. Okay, but i commit, that i don't know if a stable release of netcdf is building cleaner. Also build process is taking a *very* long time, but thats because of CDBS. debian/control: * You miss some build-deps. The build process does use texi2dvi while building, which is in package texinfo. Also you need to build-depend on tex because texi2dvi does not work without a running tex installation. Version of your package results in a lintian warning, because your version string is not like it should be in Debian. Your version should be foo-x.x.x (another .x is for NMUs). Best Regards Patrick Warren Turkal wrote: > Debian Mentors, > > I have worked tonight to produce new netcdf packages for the NetCDF libraries. > They are located at [1]. I would like some feedback on them. They are based > on cdbs. [2] is a link to a WNPP bug about this package. I would like to > adopt the package, if possible. > > Thanks, > wt > > [1]http://www.penguintechs.org/~wt/debian/netcdf/ > [2]http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=321336
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature