On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 11:43:14AM -0000, Paul Cager wrote: > What is the recommended approach here? > > (1) Ignore the problem - it is only an *informational* message, > and previous releases have ignored it. > (2) Patch as recommended in msg01481.html; send patch to upstream author. > (3) Send a bug report upstream. > > I would favour option (2), but what's the consensus? I agree that Debian maintainers should not wait for upstream to fix things they can do themselves, that they should indeed fix things they can, and that they should send patches upstream. In other words, I fully agree with option (2). :-) Thanks, Bas -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/e-mail.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature