[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: shc -- #335278 broken packaging -- non-DD NMU prepared

On Saturday 15 July 2006 03:48, Russ Allbery wrote:
> George Danchev <danchev@spnet.net> writes:
> > On Friday 14 July 2006 10:08, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> >> They could check that non-NMU uploads must not say "Non maintainer
> >> upload" in the changelog.  Appearantly they don't do that.  I think a
> >> wishlist bug is in order there.
> >
> > Well, it makes no difference which case you have. Anyways if you have a
> > conflicting declarations for debian-revision value and /Non-maintainer
> > upload/i as first changelog entry, lintian&linda should warn about. In
> > fact I can see such an attempt in /usr/share/lintian/checks/nmu but it
> > doesn't work as expected or at least for me. I'll try to investigate
> > that further.
> lintian warns if you do an NMU without mentioning it in the changelog, but
> although it has the necessary information to do so, it doesn't do the
> inverse.  Committing a fix now.

Thanks for your support. Could you please also specify (in copyright or at 
http://lintian.debian.org/ ?) which SCM and where you use to maintain and 
develop lintian ? I'd like to test that change for instance. Thanks.

pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB 

Reply to: