Re: shc -- #335278 broken packaging -- non-DD NMU prepared
On Thursday 13 July 2006 23:22, Nigel Jones wrote:
> From memory, aren't NMU's (even more so, non-DD NMU's) only meant to
> fix RC bugs? Not new upstream releases?
> Just 2 cents
This new upstream release (3.8.6) resolves both: rc4 implementation bugs and
license issues. If I go for backporting these to 3.7 release I'd end up again
to 3.8.6. There is nothing 'stable' in the 3.7-2 package (which is currently
in the archive) to cary on, it is plain RC-buggy.
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB