Re: RFS: tinyscheme
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:38:00PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> I only checked your package and here are my comments:
> - Your changelog file closes no ITP bug in BTS, it should
Thanks for pointing this out, I didn't know ITP's were supposed to be
done for packages awaiting sponsorship (I know, should do my homework
> - your standards version is not the current, please check
> your package with current policy and adjust the number
> - check your files with ispell, afaik it should be
> stand-alone instead of standalone
aspell sees no problem... I think both forms are in broad use.
> - Fill in the Copyright field in copyright file, its not the
> same as license
Huh? "Copyright (c) 2000, Dimitrios Souflis"... oh, I see, it's in the
wrong place. Okay.
> - uncomment not needed comments in rules file
> - your package dependencies are broken, there is no package
> named stx2any in debian
stx2any is one of the packages I'm seeking sponsors for. The package
really needs stx2any to build (the man pages are generated with it), so
I don't think there's any way to circumvent this.
Many of your comments apply to my other packages as well, so I'm
probably going to improve them as well.
personal contact: email@example.com, +35841 5323835
technical contact: firstname.lastname@example.org, http://www.iki.fi/atehwa/
PGP fingerprint: 0EA5 9D33 6590 FFD4 921C 5A5F BE85 08F1 3169 70EC