On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 16:34 +0000, Martin Meredith wrote: > Are you still interested in sponsoring this? Yes, I am just a bit overloaded. > > But why do you need libstdc++5-3.3-dev for building rar? You wrote that otherwise the libstdc++5 dependency would not come in as the binary dependency. The shlibs way does not work I ACK, but the 'do nothing and it will be good' seems to be working. Ie I have dropped the libstdc++5-3.3-dev as build-dependency, no debian/shlibs file; still the correct runtime build dependency was created on libstdc++5 . At least on x86, can you confirm? > > About unrar: I would be happier to sponsor that, because that's the way > > rar can you away - rar creates only more archives. :-( Meaning: [...] because that's the way rar can _go_ away [...] . Regards, Laszlo/GCS
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part