Hi ,
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 13:11:23 +0900
Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1.
> > > 2.
> > > Is the priority '50' for x-window-manager alternatives
> > > correct? How did you calculate the value?
> > >
> > I did't notice this .
> > I changed this priority to 10.
> > The reason for this WM is that it is thought that priority
> > levels are lower than other WM when the reason examined the
> > priority of other WM.
>
> According to: '11.8.4. Packages providing a window manager'
> It should be 20
>
> Did I miss something ?
I'm sorry I missed this debian-policy.
It set it to 20 because there was no element that added the priority.
>
> 2. I've sent a separate mail about your description.
>
Yes, I transmitted a message some time ago.
>
>
> With these points fixed, your package looks good that I could sponsor.
Thank you very much .
regards,
Iwamatsu
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
< hemamu @ t-base.ne.jp >
< iwamatsu @ nigauri.org >
Key fingerprint = 353A C650 BB7A 6F72 3650 9461 4121 C743 3170 EBE9
ICQ : 8095912
Attachment:
00000001.mimetmp
Description: PGP signature