Re: Proposal for collaborative maintenance of packages
- To: Daniel Holbach <daniel.holbach@ubuntu.com>
- Cc: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>, debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, debian-qa@lists.debian.org, ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com, neilm@debian.org, Reinhard Tartler <siretart@tauware.de>, Stefan Potyra <daemon@poleboy.de>, support@mentors.debian.net
- Subject: Re: Proposal for collaborative maintenance of packages
- From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:09:47 +0100
- Message-id: <20051219200947.GA32531@glandium.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Daniel Holbach <daniel.holbach@ubuntu.com>, Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>, debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, debian-qa@lists.debian.org, ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com, neilm@debian.org, Reinhard Tartler <siretart@tauware.de>, Stefan Potyra <daemon@poleboy.de>, support@mentors.debian.net
- In-reply-to: <1134977082.9759.38.camel@localhost.localdomain>
- References: <20051218161947.GA21970@localhost.localdomain> <1134977082.9759.38.camel@localhost.localdomain>
> Am Sonntag, den 18.12.2005, 17:19 +0100 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> > This infrastructure is seriously needed in Debian because:
> > - team maintenance with SVN is more and more popular, and a good web
> > interface above a SVN repo of Debian packages would help all those
> > teams
>
> I'd be in favour or a bzr solution, not because of random
> flame-war-feature-reasons, but of the central approach SVN takes. You
> have to handle permissions, have to take care of a lot of people, which
> is not a technical problem, but a social problem too. People do feel
> locked out.
If the central approach of svn is scary to you, just use svk. It is
compatible with svn and is decentralized.
Mike
Reply to: