On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 08:19:21PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > I've packaged gaim-extendedprefs and closed the ITP bug in revision > > 3 but my sponsors upload was not accepted by katie due to a missing > > .orig.tar.gz. On request of my sponsor I'm making some changes to > > the package, and I'm wondering if I have to close the ITP again in > > the changelog for revision 4? I'm not sure if the bugs closed in > > revisions not accepted, will be closed when closed when a new > > revision is accepted. > I believe the bug will not be closed unless you mention it again. But > I don't know if it makes sense to do so. Look at the .changes file to > see if it has Closes: #N to tell. Seems like it would be best to > leave the changelog as is, and just send a message to N-done@b.d.o to > close. Blah... and what about -v switch for dpkg-buildpackage? Arjan don't close ITP again in your changelog. Just make sure to build it so two entries will be considered as new one. Also you *have to* tell it to your sponsor. Just tell him to use `dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -v1.2.3-4` or something like that. Please read `man dpkg-buildpackage`. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:fenio@debian.org | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:fenio@jabber.org | rlu:172001
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature