Hi, I have packages gaim-extendedprefs and close the ITP in the changelog of revision 3. My sponsors upload of revision 3 did not get accepted due to a missing .orig.gz, and since then I have made some changes to the package on request of my sponsor. Now I'm wondering if I should close the ITP in the changelog of revision 4 again? Are closing statements in revisions not accepted or uploaded considered by katie when accepting a new revisions, or do you have to affirm all previous fixed bugs in the changelog of the revision which is accepted by katie. Greetings Arjan Oosting
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend