Re: RFC: Packages Needing Sponsors page
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 03:35:33 +0100,
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <jeroen@wolffelaar.nl> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 08:55:53PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm trying to clean up WNPP.
>>
>> As you may recall, I'm encouraging people to use ITP+patch to mean
>> "This packages is ready to be uploaded, and I'm only waiting on a
>> sponsor". As part of my effort, I've created a webpage [0] of such
>> packages.
>>
>> So, if you have an opened ITP, and you are still persuing an upload,
>> tag the bug 'patch' and it'll show up at midnight.
>
> I'm sorry I didn't reply earlier -- I like your idea's, but have a
> alternative implementation suggestion: Use 'forwarded' with an URL to
> indicate package is ready and needing a sponsor -- the BTS will then
> separate these bugs in a different heading, plus you immediately
> click-through to the canonical location for that ITP's package location.
Very good idea.
- --
.''`.
: :' :rnaud
`. `'
`-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB6uq+4vzFZu62tMIRAo0pAJ9xgJVFHTKoGML7vUIQcGEy5G7kogCfWulG
QhyJxrzHbruvyEO0KZNnjxk=
=zBFg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: