[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: dmalloc



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Frank Küster wrote:
| stappers@stappers.nl (Geert Stappers) wrote:
|
|
|>On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:59:35PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
|>
|>>Version: 5.3.0-4
|
| [...]
|
|>>Description: Debug memory allocation library - transition package
|>>~ This is an empty package which depends on libdmalloc4, to provide for
|>
|>            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|>
|>
|>>~ smooth upgrades. It can safely be removed.
|
| [...]
|
|>Provide something that is worth spending time on.
|
|
| Why do you think a transition package isn't worth spending time on? Luk,
| I think posting the changelog entry might increase your chances of being
| sponsored.

There are 3 binary packages in the source package of which one is a
transition package...

dmalloc (5.3.0-4) unstable; urgency=high

~  * Urgency high because of uninstallable in sarge
~  * debian/control: removed Conflicts (Closes: #267743)
~  * debian/control: dmalloc in oldlibs
~  * debian/rules: dmalloc in binary-indep (Closes: #265019)

~ -- Luk Claes <luk.claes@ugent.be>  Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:52:22 +0200

The previous version didn't install because I wanted to get rid of the
transition package (dmalloc) in the upgrade, but I didn't thought it
would be refused to enter testing. The other 2 binary packages
libdmalloc4 and libdmalloc4-dev do install...

Cheers

Luk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBNJ+c5UTeB5t8Mo0RAmX7AJ9Ysl4kvm4W4ybaysbOIQ6sdc5eBwCgg48h
6j6/0TR3YtutjKx+y14/eLM=
=NAVw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: