> Documentation was missing from the package for a while, but it's back now; > see /usr/share/doc/cdbs/cdbs.html and /usr/share/doc/cdbs/why.html for > starters. > > I agree, documentation is rather helpful to have. =) well, _more_ documentation would be helpfull too. we cannot say cdbs doc is very verbose ... for example, I've tryed hard (even with grepping /usr/share/cdbs) to find how cdbs handled lintian overrides, /usr/share/doc symlink for multi binary packages ... And I've gave up to use a cdbs mechanism and I've used some dh_* scripts (and even cp's grrr) for those parts ... There is no FAQ, even no real cdbs page ([1] is really not a good page, even with the fancy png) And don't misundersand me, cdbs is really _great_ but its documentation well, it cannot suck, it even doesn't really exists IMHO [1] http://build-common.alioth.debian.org/ -- Pierre Habouzit http://www.madism.org/ -==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==- gpg : 1024D/A1EE761C 6045 409E 5CB5 2CEA 3E70 F17E C41E 995C C98C 90BE spam: mad.junk@madism.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature