Hi, lots of thanks again. I think gnotify_0.8.2-5 is ok now, at least it builds clearly in an pbuilder environment. Is there anything else I should correct? Any hints are welcome. Kind regards, simon On Tue, 4 May 2004 01:55:01 +0200 GCS <gcs@lsc.hu> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 01:08:19AM +0200, Simon MARTIN <simon.martin@gmx.at> wrote: > > based on your hints, I've tried to fix my bugs. > Ouch. You misunderstood me. I asked you to put libgtk2.0-dev, > autotools-dev and probably libtool as well to the _'Build-Depends'_ field > of the source package. Please read Debian Policy part 4.2 and 7.6: > " > 7.6. Relationships between source and binary packages - `Build-Depends', > `Build-Depends-Indep', `Build-Conflicts', `Build-Conflicts-Indep' > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Source packages that require certain binary packages to be installed > or absent at the time of building the package can declare > relationships to those binary packages. > > This is done using the `Build-Depends', `Build-Depends-Indep', > `Build-Conflicts' and `Build-Conflicts-Indep' control file fields. > > Build-dependencies on "build-essential" binary packages can be > omitted. Please see Section 4.2, `Package relationships' for more > information. > " > > Therefore, version 0.8.1 > > and 0.8.2 was created by me manually (the orig.tar.gz was changed > > therefore; upstream maintainer has been told), > I think you shouldn't change upstream version. When I was a beginner in > Debian package making, I used only upstream_version-1, and added my > changes there. But there's a better approach, I learnt from someone here > on this list: for the initial release use upstream_version-0.1 (-0.2, -0.3 > and so on -- it's for NMU-ing a package, but as you should reset the > debian/changelog before the real upload, this does not hurt. > > > so finally, I've at least > > reached a small target: As far as I can see it, gnotify 0.8.2-1 is the > > first that is completely lintian- and linda-clean (and completely I > > mean, I do not even get warnings any more). > Sounds very good. > > Cheers, > Laszlo/GCS >
Attachment:
pgp2wqIVQxp9W.pgp
Description: PGP signature