This one time, at band camp, Colin Watson said: > There's ~, but you can't use that until sarge has been released. > > In the absence of that, something like 0.69-really-0.70-rc-1 (or what > you suggest) is a common workaround. It's not too bad to change the > tarball name. OK, if it's not a big deal to change the tarball name, then I will just go ahead and do that. I was thinking it made for more complication than it apparently does - the thing I'm worried about is uploading when 0.70 comes out, and I am uploading a new tarball. If both are named 0.70 (wuith only the revision changing from -0rc1 to -1), I thought the pool managing scripts would complain. Maybe the ugly but workable 0.69-really-0.70-rc-1 is the best way to go, so there is definitely no confusion. Thanks, -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : sgran@debian.org | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgpRZflws4wGM.pgp
Description: PGP signature