[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: gURLChecker



El sáb, 03-01-2004 a las 23:18, Geert Stappers escribió:
> On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 10:13:55PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 04:25:56PM +0100, Daniel Pecos wrote:
> > > Hi everybody and happy new year!
> > > 
> > > I'm looking for an sponsor for a package I had created time ago. Here
> > > you have a little info about if:
> > > 
> > >     Name: gURLChecker    
> > >     License: GPL
> > >     Short Description: URL checker for GNOME2
> > >     Long Description: gURLChecker is a GNOME2 tool that can check links
> > > 	on a single web page or on a whole web site in order to determine
> > >	validity of each page.
> > > 
> > > I think it is a good tool for those who have a big web page and
> > > eventually want to check the validity of its links. It has a good GTK2
> > > interface, and it is really easy to use, giving a very clear chart of
> > > results.
> > Yes, I have interrest in such tool.
> > 
> > > 
> > > At this moment I have two packages: gurlchecker and
> > > gurlchecker-unstable, one for the stable branch and other for the
> > > unstable one ;-)
> > > 
> > > I have the packages available with this APT sources:
> > > 	
> > > deb http://www.aditel.org/~dpecos/debian/packages binary/
> > > deb-src http://www.aditel.org/~dpecos/debian/packages source/
> > 
> > After including the deb-src line and a `apt-get source`, I got
> > 
> >   gurlchecker_0.6.3-1.tar.gz
> > 
> > 
> > When reading http://www.gnu.org/directory/webauth/misc/gURLChecker.html
> > I would expect
> > 
> >   gurlchecker_1.6.3-1.orig.tar.gz
>      gurlchecker_1.6.3.orig.tar.gz  ( oops )

	Ok, I will fix the name format, but the version number is the same as
the one in the project homepage (http://www.nongnu.org/gurlchecker/)

> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Reduce debian/changelog to debian relevant parts and close ITP #187423

	Ok.

> > 
> > (I didn't look any further)
> > 
> > > 
> > > Thank you!
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Daniel Pecos Martinez
> > 
> > Geert Stappers
> >
-- 
Daniel Pecos



Reply to: