Re: minimum package name length
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 12:25:59AM +0100, Tilman Koschnick wrote:
> When looking at the existing names, I noticed that there are no package
> names with only two characters, and not that many with three.
except for : af an at bb bc bl cu cw dc di dx ed ee es fv gb gq gs gv hf
ht hx im kq le lv m4 mc mp nd ne nn pi pv qe qm rc re ri sc sl sn sp tf
ud vh vm wl wv xt
Frank
> Cheers, Til
--
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
Reply to: