[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: package name conventions?



also sprach Antonio S. de A. Terceiro <asaterceiro@inf.ufrgs.br> [2004.11.17.2330 +0100]:
> I'm finishing a package for PStreams (pstreams.sf.net), and the
> name I gave at first for the package was "pstreams". But maybe the
> correct name should be "libpstreams".

I should note that I asked the question as part of the sponsoring,
and...

> libfactory++-dev - C++ template factory framework

... that this is my software, which I named libfactory because I did
not know better. It's also just a set of headers, so more a toolkit
than a library... but nomenclature is vague here...

It would be interesting to get some comments on this.

FWIW, I am now almost in favour of pstreams -- as Antonio originally
called it -- as it's the product name after all.

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: