also sprach Sven Mueller <email@example.com> [2004.09.30.1936 +0200]: > The major advantage above using SpamAssassin (both plain and spamc/spamd > based) is that it doesn't need to load all needed perl modules nor does > it need to load a C program on each mail reception. Compared to the > spamc/spamd pair, a 25% performance gain isn't unusual with local > tests. And its major disadvantage is that it cannot be configured per-user. This makes bayesian filtering kinda useless. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <firstname.lastname@example.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Description: Digital signature