Re: debconf question

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: debconf question
From: Brian Nelson <pyro@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 10:46:01 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 87u0wbhkbq.fsf@bignachos.com>
Mail-followup-to: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200407131204.55558@fortytwo.ch> (Adrian von Bidder's message of "Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:04:53 +0200")
References: <[🔎] 200407131204.55558@fortytwo.ch>

Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <avbidder@fortytwo.ch> writes:

> And while I'm at it: the behaviour change is not really dangerous, but 
> can cause people to get more spam. (Background: postgrey changed from 
> --lookup-by-host to --lookup-by-subnet in Version 1.14) So, is a 
> debconf notice even necessary, or would NEWS.Debian suffice?

I think NEWS.Debian would be the proper place.  Debconf notes should
only be used to report total breakage, not minor issues, AIUI.

-- 
You win again, gravity!

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: debconf question
  - From: "Nathaniel W. Turner" <nate@houseofnate.net>

References:
- debconf question
  - From: Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <avbidder@fortytwo.ch>

Prev by Date: Re: How to link against non-public shared libraries?
Next by Date: Re: How to link against non-public shared libraries?
Previous by thread: Re: debconf question
Next by thread: Re: debconf question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread