sorry for the delay, i was gone for the weekend. On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 06:11:30PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > The copyright file is broken (no copyright). darn, fixed > The package description should be more factual, IMO the text you put > into README.Debian would be much more appropriate. In fact, after you've > put the description where it belongs, you could loose the README.Debian > file. It's not mandated and it's purpose is not to give another > description of the package, but rather to include notes about it's use. i think the package description is accurate, but i would like to hear improvements anyway. the README.Debian lists about stuff the debian package doesn't do that the upstream source claims to do or does, i am working on this. namely this is a kernel module that makes every unlink() on the system a secure remove. i will add it later if the problems with it can be resolved. i changed the README.Debian to make that a bit more clear. a -2 version is at http://www.semistable.com/files , please have a look! cu robert -- Robert Lemmen http://www.semistable.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature