On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 03:23:41PM +0200, Matthijs wrote: > On Sat, 2004-05-01 at 13:55, Geert Stappers wrote: <snip/> > > <snip what="irrelevant signature"/> Please delete old text, so it wouldn't send (and multiplied) again. > > > > <snip/> > > > > And where did you tell which files are for which package? > > > > That's idd true. But i've told that already isn't it ? (in > libinklevel1.install). Ah, the .install files that is what I learned today. TNX. > I've checked it with: > dh_install -plibinklevel1 --list-missing and get this back: <snip/> > When i check the manpage of dh_install they have a source and > destination. Do i need to add them to the command dh_install ? Sorry, no answer from me... > > > > > Other feedback from the time that I spent on libinklevel: > > > > * put the the debian directory online. That makes it easier to check. > > ( twice a wget, an untar, an unzip and appling and patch > > could be avoid (by you) for your peer reviewers ) > > > > I'll take that with me. > http://www.cacholong.nl/~matthijs/libinklevel/debian.tgz So your reviewers have to download it and gunzip it. Me request to posters here, is to put the files from the debian directory online. ( and still the diff.gz, .dsc & .orig.tar.gz ) > > > > > > > Cheers > > Geert Stappers > > > > Thanks for reviewing my package. You are welcome, it is all about co-operation... Een prettige dag.
Attachment:
pgphaVsrNi5dT.pgp
Description: PGP signature