[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Question on License



On 2004-04-23 04:42:09 +0100 Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org> wrote:

> Overall, looks to me like another cut-n-paste licence which wasn't 
> even
> proofread by the author, let alone anyone with legal qualifications.  
> But I
> can't see anything that makes it non-free.  We can comply with all 
> the terms
> of the licence from what I can see.

I agree and I'm fairly sure a licence very like this (probably even 
P.L.Daniels) has been discussed on -legal before. Please use the list 
archives and only question if it's unclear.

By the way, Pantomime is under a ?GPL if a GNUstep library for MIME is 
useful to you. I think it's already packaged.

-- 
MJR/slef     My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ slef@jabber.at
  Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
RFC3156 defines security multipart formats for MIME with OpenPGP.

Attachment: pgpqFlUVaBpSC.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: