Re: Why Katie thinks it's an NMU?
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 12:42:01PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 11:30:54PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Jeroen van Wolffelaar <email@example.com> writes:
> > > Err, why should katie do that based on the version number? That's very
> > > unlikely, katie can simply see whether the .changes file contains a
> > > source too, even more, katie doesn't care about buildd's, (iirc)
> > Only the initial upload contains a source, the buildd uploads and
> > manual port builds don't.
> > Katie ensures that the initial upload does in fact contain
> > source, or rather it checks if source for an upload are
> > available. Sources for a binary only recompile upload (1.2-3.4.5)
> > have to look for the non recompile version for source (1.2-3.4
> > diff/dsc, 1.2 orig.tar.gz or 1.2-3.4 tar.gz).
> I never said otherwise. As you quoted myself:
> > > Err, why should katie do that based on the version number?
> And indeed, if you read katie (and jennifer), you will find it doesn't
> care, it uses afaics the 'Source:' header from the .changes.
Please see the source_exists function here:
Colin Watson [firstname.lastname@example.org]