[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Why Katie thinks it's an NMU?



On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 12:42:01PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 11:30:54PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Jeroen van Wolffelaar <jeroen@wolffelaar.nl> writes:
> > > Err, why should katie do that based on the version number? That's very
> > > unlikely, katie can simply see whether the .changes file contains a
> > > source too, even more, katie doesn't care about buildd's, (iirc)
> > 
> > Only the initial upload contains a source, the buildd uploads and
> > manual port builds don't.
> > 
> > Katie ensures that the initial upload does in fact contain
> > source, or rather it checks if source for an upload are
> > available. Sources for a binary only recompile upload (1.2-3.4.5)
> > have to look for the non recompile version for source (1.2-3.4
> > diff/dsc, 1.2 orig.tar.gz or 1.2-3.4 tar.gz).
> 
> I never said otherwise. As you quoted myself:
> 
> > > Err, why should katie do that based on the version number? 
>                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> And indeed, if you read katie (and jennifer), you will find it doesn't
> care, it uses afaics the 'Source:' header from the .changes. 

Please see the source_exists function here:

  http://cvs.debian.org/*checkout*/dak/katie.py?rev=1.45&cvsroot=dak

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]



Reply to: