On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 20:54 +0000, Roger Leigh wrote: > On a related note, I'd also be very happy if it was a requirement to > build libraries with a miniumum of "-g -ggdb -gdwarf-2", and not strip > them. We could provide some mechanism to automatically strip > binaries, surely? I believe that this was discussed before and never really got off of the ground because of the bandwidth issues involved. By the way, doesn't "-ggdb3" provide more verbose debugging information?
Description: This is a digitally signed message part