[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Development packages.

On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 20:54 +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:

> On a related note, I'd also be very happy if it was a requirement to
> build libraries with a miniumum of "-g -ggdb -gdwarf-2", and not strip
> them.  We could provide some mechanism to automatically strip
> binaries, surely?

I believe that this was discussed before and never really got off of the
ground because of the bandwidth issues involved.

By the way, doesn't "-ggdb3" provide more verbose debugging information?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: