Re: cpufreqd braindamaged versions

[Mattia Dongili <dongili@supereva.it>]

On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 10:41:11PM -0500, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
> On Sunday 04 January 2004 19:41, Mattia Dongili wrote:
[...]
> What about simply 1.1.0-1?

I'll go with that then.

> Either one is certainly better than an epoch.  This way, when 1.2 is released, 
> you can go back to simply using 1.2-1.
> 
> For your next set of RC packages, you might use a scheme such as
> 1.1.90+1.2rc1 or something that will evaulate as less than 1.2, but I'm sure 
> you've already figured that out. =)

# grep -c 'dpkg --compare-versions' ~/.bash_history
66

:)

thanks to everybody
-- 
mattia
:wq!