Hi! Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 01:11:57PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 11:55:04AM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote: > > > > > The debian/changelog entry: > > > > > > > musixtex (1:0.112-1) unstable; urgency=low > > > > > > > > * New upstream release (Closes: #193729) > > > > Include a note in the changelog explaining that it is an NMU. > > And the version number should be 1:0.112-0.1 for an NMU. OK. Prepared at http://www.antcom.de/musixtex/ : > musixtex (1:0.112-0.1) unstable; urgency=low > > * NMU > * New upstream release (Closes: #193729) > * Moved package from Section: non-free/tex to tex (GPL now) > * Added Section: doc for musixtex-doc (Closes: #135762) > * Removed wrong links from Description field (Closes: #193707) > * Removed misleading reference to GNU LilyPond from Description > (Closes: #169918) > * Adjusted debian/postinst: added texhash call instead of manual > configuration (Closes: #33107) > * Adjusted debian/copyright (-> GPL) > * Standards-Version: 3.5.10 > > -- Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de> Sat, 14 Jun 2003 10:52:14 +0200 Please note that I'm aware of the fact that musixtex doesn't have any RC bugs filed. But it's clearly so unmaintained and the maintainer gave the permission to NMU. Thanks! bye, Roland -- Roland Stigge
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part