Re: Replacing a package with a newer, renamed version of itself.
Conflict against all versions before the transition package.
This should work, right?
Thanks,
Roger
Quoting "Leo \\Costela\\ Antunes" <costela@debian.org>:
> On Sat, 2003-04-19 at 15:22, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > the conflicts and replaces make a new install of the package over the old
> one
> > go smoothly. However, it will not cause apt to automatically move to the
> new
> > package.
>
> A good solution IMO is to keep a fake (empty) package of
> radiusd-freeradius that depends on the new freeradius package, that way,
> if someone does have it installed, apt-get will try to upgrade it and
> then install the new package. You'll have to dump the Conflicts though,
> or else apt-get won't let you upgrade a package that'll be removed on
> the same run.
>
> Hope I've been helpful
>
> Cheers
> --
>
> Leo Costela
> <costelaaa@ig.com.br> | <costela@debian.org> | <costela@pop.com.br>
> Key Fingerprint: 8AE6CDFF6535192FB5B659212262D36F7ADF9466
> "you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!"
> --
>
> Leo Costela
> <costelaaa@ig.com.br> | <costela@debian.org> | <costela@pop.com.br>
> Key Fingerprint: 8AE6CDFF6535192FB5B659212262D36F7ADF9466
> "you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!"
>
Reply to: