DeMuDi
Does it make sense for a separate "community" style distribution, such
as DeMuDi (Debian Multimedia Distribution - see www.agnula.org)??
AGNULA is making a Red-Hat based (ReHMuDi) as well as the Debian based
distribution.
In my mind, at least before Fedora, it makes sense to have a "red hat
based distro", so as to have an "open" development forum for the
development of the distro.
For Debian however, we already have that, so I don't understand why
DeMuDi doesn't simply work with SID proper, and integrate themselves
into the existing Debian development process...
if someone can explain this to me, I'd be appreciative.
As a point of reference, below is the README.WHATSNEXT file found at the
Demudi download site, http://download.agnula.org/1.0/.
I note the the last sentence asking "Any hint on how to best contribute
to Debian should be sent to info@agnula.org.".
(And for those interested, the reason I'm pursuing this is I'm trying to
find qjackconnect packaged for Debian somewhere...).
TIA
Zenaan
--- http://download.agnula.org/1.0/README.WHATSNEXT
WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS
What will happen after this release?
Well, to put it shortly:
- we are rewriting our build system, which is more or less a set of
spaghetti code not too suited for quality control, collaboration, and
all those goodies that help making a good distribution. Well, there
is nothing like trying to build a distro to learn the do and don't of
building a distro. :)
The new build system will most probably be heavily based on Debian
build daemon scripts. The planned date for deployment of the new
build infrastructure is 15-20 August. If you want any information,
don't hesitate to write us at info@agnula.org, but please bear with
any late reply: we will be very busy doing what we should answer
about.
- there are some packages which didn't make it into the 1.0
distribution that we absolutely want to put in the next release.
Namely ardour and PlanetCCRMA software. Of course, if *you* would
like to see any software inside AGNULA/DeMuDi, write us. Keep in mind
that we can only (and only want to) package "free" software (free as
in `free speech', not as in `free beer', of course).
- we are evaluating switching from woody to sarge or to a precise
snapshot of sid as the base system to build on. Woody is too old, and
backporting packages to it has become really cumbersome - and tends to
substract forces from our already scarcely sized team.
- we are trying to understand how best we can contribute back to
Debian. There are already some packages, made by us, which we are
just waiting to polish a bit before uploading them to the Debian
archive. Any hint on how to best contribute to Debian should be sent
to info@agnula.org.
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DeMuDi
- From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <frankie@debian.org>